Skip to content

Conversation

@DefinetlyNotAI
Copy link
Owner

@DefinetlyNotAI DefinetlyNotAI commented Jul 26, 2025

Reverted to linux and fixed the invalid security bot codeql

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal workflow configuration to use a Linux environment for automated greetings. No impact on user-facing features.

Reverted to linux

Signed-off-by: Shahm Najeeb <[email protected]>
@DefinetlyNotAI DefinetlyNotAI self-assigned this Jul 26, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 26, 2025 18:20
@DefinetlyNotAI DefinetlyNotAI added bug/Medium Something isn't working, it's affecting the running of the program! request/Minor New feature or request, not important, may not do type/Github Actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code type/Development Related to Development issues labels Jul 26, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS Extra Small size pr label Jul 26, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@pull-request-size[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69ba163 and 36b54c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/greetings.yml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for greetings was updated to use a Linux runner instead of a Windows runner. No other changes were made to the workflow configuration.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/greetings.yml Changed workflow runner from Windows to Linux.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

type/System

Poem

Switched up the runner, Windows is gone,
Now Linux takes over, scripts running strong.
The workflow’s still friendly, just changed its shoes—
More open-source vibes, less Microsoft blues.
🚀🐧

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch Patch-v3.5

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR reverts the runner environment from Windows to Linux and addresses CodeQL security bot issues. The change simplifies the CI/CD pipeline by using a more standard Linux environment.

  • Reverted GitHub Actions runner from Windows to Linux
  • Fixed invalid security bot CodeQL configuration
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/greetings.yml:10

  • The runner 'linux-latest' is not a valid GitHub Actions runner. Use 'ubuntu-latest' instead, which is the correct identifier for the latest Ubuntu Linux runner.
    runs-on: linux-latest

Signed-off-by: Shahm Najeeb <[email protected]>
@qltysh
Copy link
Contributor

qltysh bot commented Jul 26, 2025

❌ 4 blocking issues (4 total)

Tool Category Rule Count
yamllint Lint string value is redundantly quoted with any quotes 3
prettier Style Incorrect formatting, autoformat by running qlty fmt. 1

@qltysh one-click actions:

  • Auto-fix formatting in progress (qlty fmt && git push)...

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a17173b and 69ba163.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/greetings.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: DefinetlyNotAI
PR: DefinetlyNotAI/Logicytics#225
File: CODE/logicytics/Flag.py:583-592
Timestamp: 2025-05-31T12:42:30.615Z
Learning: In the Logicytics codebase, DefinetlyNotAI prefers using exit() over sys.exit() and doesn't want suggestions to change this pattern.
Learnt from: DefinetlyNotAI
PR: DefinetlyNotAI/Logicytics#225
File: CODE/logicytics/Flag.py:583-592
Timestamp: 2025-05-31T12:42:30.615Z
Learning: In the Logicytics codebase, DefinetlyNotAI prefers to allow lines longer than 100 characters when they make sense contextually, rather than enforcing strict line length limits.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/greetings.yml

10-10: label "linux-latest" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2025", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-24.04-arm", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-22.04-arm", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-15-xlarge", "macos-15-large", "macos-15", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file

(runner-label)

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Waiting on Review in Issue Board Jul 26, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/L Large size pr and removed size/XS Extra Small size pr labels Jul 26, 2025
Co-authored-by: qltysh[bot] <168846912+qltysh[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shahm Najeeb <[email protected]>
@DefinetlyNotAI
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai Approve the pr please

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

I can't actually approve pull requests - I'm a code review bot, not a human reviewer with approval permissions! Only repository maintainers or users with the right permissions can approve PRs.

However, I can help you get this PR ready for approval by checking out the changes and any issues. Let me take a look at what's been modified:

After I see what's actually in these files, I can give you feedback on whether the changes look good and help address any of those blocking issues that qltysh flagged!

To get your PR approved, you'll need to:

  1. Fix those 5 blocking issues that qltysh found
  2. Have a human reviewer with approval permissions review and approve it

Let me check out those files first so I can help you with the technical side! 🐰


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the files that were changed in this PR
echo "=== Checking greetings.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/greetings.yml

echo -e "\n=== Checking codeql.yml ==="  
cat .github/workflows/codeql.yml

echo -e "\n=== Looking for any other modified files ==="
git diff --name-only HEAD~1

Length of output: 6043


Great! Now I can see what's going on. Let me break down what I found:

Technical Review of Changes

✅ The changes look good from a functionality perspective:

  1. greetings.yml: Already using ubuntu-latest (Linux runner) - this matches your PR goal of "reverting to Linux"
  2. codeql.yml: This is a solid CodeQL security scanning setup that analyzes both Python and GitHub Actions - exactly what you'd want for the Logicytics project

Issues to Fix (from qltysh)

The blocking issues qltysh found are mostly formatting/style problems:

How to Get This Approved

Since I can't approve PRs (I'm just a review bot! 🤖), here's what you need to do:

  1. Fix the qltysh issues - The bot even offered an auto-fix option: qlty fmt && git push
  2. Get a human reviewer - You'll need someone with repository permissions to actually approve
  3. Consider the security concern - Checkov flagged permissions being set to write-all, which might be a legitimate security issue to address

The core functionality changes (Linux runner + CodeQL setup) look solid to me! Just need to clean up those formatting issues and get a human to hit the approve button.

Want me to take a closer look at those specific formatting issues once I see the quote patterns? 🐰


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the specific issues qltysh mentioned
echo "=== Looking for redundant quotes in YAML files ==="
rg -n "'" .github/workflows/ -A2 -B2

echo -e "\n=== Checking the permissions that checkov flagged ==="
rg -n "permissions:" .github/workflows/ -A5

Length of output: 7803


Perfect! Now I can see exactly what qltysh is complaining about. Here's the breakdown:

🔍 Issues Found (most are in OTHER files, not your changes!)

Redundant Quotes (yamllint)

These cron expressions don't need quotes:

  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml:20cron: '0 0 * * 1' should be cron: 0 0 * * 1
  • .github/workflows/stale.yml:10cron: '00 00 * * *' should be cron: 00 00 * * *
  • .github/workflows/scorecard.yml:13cron: '33 9 * * 6' should be cron: 33 9 * * 6

And some message strings in stale.yml have unnecessary quotes.

Security Issue (checkov)

The big one: .github/workflows/scorecard.yml:18 has permissions: read-all at the top level, which gives way too broad permissions!

Formatting (prettier)

Probably some spacing issues that qlty fmt can auto-fix.

💡 Good News!

Your actual changes (greetings.yml using Linux + the CodeQL setup) look solid! These issues are mostly in existing files, not the stuff you modified.

🛠️ Quick Fix Options:

  1. Auto-fix formatting: Run qlty fmt && git push like qltysh suggested
  2. Manual fix the quotes: Remove the single quotes around those cron expressions
  3. Fix the security issue: Replace permissions: read-all in scorecard.yml with specific permissions

Want me to show you exactly what the fixed versions should look like, or are you good to run that auto-fix command? The core changes you made are totally fine - just need to clean up these pre-existing lint issues! 🐰


🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: DefinetlyNotAI
PR: DefinetlyNotAI/Logicytics#225
File: CODE/logicytics/Flag.py:583-592
Timestamp: 2025-05-31T12:42:30.615Z
Learning: In the Logicytics codebase, DefinetlyNotAI prefers to allow lines longer than 100 characters when they make sense contextually, rather than enforcing strict line length limits.

Learnt from: DefinetlyNotAI
PR: DefinetlyNotAI/Logicytics#158
File: CODE/dump_memory.py:93-152
Timestamp: 2024-12-11T09:54:12.940Z
Learning: In the 'Logicytics' project, scripts like `dump_memory.py` are not supposed to consider legality concerns during code reviews.

Learnt from: DefinetlyNotAI
PR: DefinetlyNotAI/Logicytics#225
File: CODE/logicytics/Flag.py:583-592
Timestamp: 2025-05-31T12:42:30.615Z
Learning: In the Logicytics codebase, DefinetlyNotAI prefers using exit() over sys.exit() and doesn't want suggestions to change this pattern.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Waiting on Review to In Progress in Issue Board Jul 26, 2025
@DefinetlyNotAI DefinetlyNotAI merged commit d49c0f3 into main Jul 26, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Issue Board Jul 26, 2025
@DefinetlyNotAI DefinetlyNotAI deleted the Patch-v3.5 branch July 26, 2025 18:30
DefinetlyNotAI added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug/Medium Something isn't working, it's affecting the running of the program! request/Minor New feature or request, not important, may not do size/L Large size pr type/Development Related to Development issues type/Github Actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants